Comparison

ReleaseGuard vs. spreadsheets and email approvals

If your release documentation lives in a shared drive and approvals happen over email, this page is for you. Here's what changes when the process is governed.

Capability Spreadsheets Email approvals ReleaseGuard
Documentation matrix per release type
Manual per release
Not supported
Defined once, versioned, QA-approved
Separation of duties (author ≠ reviewer ≠ approver)
Policy only
Easy to bypass
Enforced at every action
Electronic signatures with password re-entry
None
None
21 CFR Part 11 aligned
File integrity (detect post-submission edits)
Not possible
Not possible
SHA-256 fingerprint
Conditional document decisions with justification
Ad-hoc
In email threads
Structured + audit-trailed
DEV / VAL / PROD stage gates
Manual checks
Manual checks
Re-checked at every promotion
Append-only audit trail
Editable, silent
In inboxes, hard to search
DB triggers refuse edits/deletes
Release dossier export (signed revisions + checksums)
Manual assembly
Manual assembly
One-click ZIP with manifest
Matrix change requires 3 distinct approvers
No structure
No structure
Manager · Quality · ProductOwner
Role-aware dashboards
Shared file, no roles
Inbox only
Per-user queues and decisions
Time to prepare for a DEV gate
2–4 days chasing updates
1–3 days chasing replies
Under 4 hours (typical)
Time to answer an audit question
Hours to days
Hours to days
Under 60 seconds

Compliance is not a bolt-on

Signatures, file fingerprints, and append-only audit records are part of the workflow — not features you turn on later.

One matrix, every release

Define required, conditional, and not-applicable documents once. Each new release inherits the exact right checklist.

Gates that actually gate

The document gate is re-checked at every promotion. When a document is missing, the release does not advance.

See the difference on your own release

15-minute walkthrough. We'll map your current process — spreadsheet, email, or otherwise — onto a live ReleaseGuard instance.